To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Efficiency
Immediately following pre-handling got took place, the interest way data try appeared having outliers (research issues bigger than step one.five times the newest interquartile range for certain varying), because of the examining boxplots. The brand new rural research situations (letter = 19) were omitted having individual analysis products during the vision-tracking methods , including cuatro.22% of your total study.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig dos) (overlooking condition anxiety) and roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (managing having condition nervousness).
Discover zero high relationship between LSAS results and you may first fixation years toward human anatomy, r (23) = -.141, p = .521 that has been along with the situation whenever controlling to possess county stress using a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Reduction
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Partial correlations together with revealed that whenever managing to have state nervousness, there is zero significant dating between the LSAS results and you will dwell time and energy to your face roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, your body r (27) = -.090, p = .643, and also the history r (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
A robust inverse relationships is actually located anywhere between scanpath size and you can LSAS score, r (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever disregarding state anxiety, and remained whenever county nervousness Sikh dating only consumer reports try managed to have roentgen (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step 3).
An effective negative matchmaking is actually found anywhere between total saccade count and you will LSAS rating, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 whenever disregarding county nervousness, and that remained tall an once county nervousness is actually regulated having roentgen (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero dating try receive ranging from suggest saccade amplitude and you will LSAS score yet not, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = .362 whether or not condition nervousness is regulated getting roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417